| Minimum
Criteria 1 |
Developing
Criteria 2 |
Accomplished
Criteria 3 |
Exemplary Criteria 4 |
Score |
|
| Prospectus |
Layout is disorganized and visually difficult to read. Criteria of prospectus is not met. |
Layout begins to show organization
and readability. Mechanics and spelling jeopardize the effectiveness of the prospectus. Criteria of prospectus is attempted. |
Layout is organized and readable
w/minimum grammatical errors. Propectus meets minimum requirements of criteria. |
Layout is visually and
aesthetically pleasing w/no grammatical errors. Prospectual goes above and beyond the minimum requirements. |
|
| Research |
Poorly organized and few reflective ideas. Very little, if any, research examples to back up your choices. No use of copyright rules. Your art work does not represent your research. |
A loose organization with a few
beginning ideas stated. Mechanics and spelling jeopardize the
effectiveness of the research and final web presentation. Your
art work begins to represent your research. Copyright format is
attempted. |
Well organized ideas supported by
no less than 4 artists each to be included in the exhibition from
your research. Minimal spelling and grammatical errors. Your personal
art work reflects your research. Copyright format is used w/only
minor errors. |
Well written and organized web exhibition and research which flows from one artist to another. Creative interpretations of your theme with all requirements met. No grammatical or spelling errors. Your art work is above and beyond expectations. Copyright format is applied correctly w/no errors. |
|
| Personal Artwork |
Poorly executed art work showing little attention to planning, detail and craftsmanship. Ideas are very basic and lack supporting evidence. |
Begins to formulate strong ideas based on initial sketches. Craftsmanship and details still lacking. |
Nice attention to presentation. Firm ideas based on many sketches. "*Creativity" is employed. (*fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration) |
Excellent use of "*Creativity", above- average presentation. Choices are extremely well thought out and it shows. |
|
| Exhibition (Planning/Notes and Final Exhibit) |
Non-existent or 'one-word' notes. Not enough images were selected to choose from. Final exhibit lacks cohesiveness. Theme is not defined clearly. |
Notes/plans are kept suggesting the direction your exhibit is going. Collection of images is beginning to take shape. Theme is somewhat defined. |
Notes describing every day and step of your process. Collection of images is strong and cohesive. Theme is defined. |
Comprehensive notes on the process, as well as analysis and reflection on the final exhibit exists. Your them is clearly defined with supporting evidence. |